CO129-336 - Governor Nathan & Public Offices - 1906 [11-12] — Page 373

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

368

the fact that he understands Leung In

but never did so himself, says (p.17) that he paid.

than paid mover

Leung zu, says (p.17)

Kelly momen

two or

Fieners, these timer Str.

cannot apparently identify these occasions

an

witte

the Jatro given

in the books.

I greatly doubt sluther Leang Lu's

wvidue

sufficiently explicit to be taken into account

(2) gors

дно must rest

which

م

far

Change

ģ think the condemnabim

the

and

Ko Sama

that he pand

huself

velato con

the money

bot Charge (B), waiving money from

Wong Joy chew;

tha Wang Joy Chew

alleges (p. 19) laat be paid $10 sofus to an entry in his books. (The

books wire

an

ps

admittedly altered later (p.21))/

312, he says

Gan interpretor

ou

that Lee

भीत

¿

accommpain

thee secard ouesi

which he want to the shop mine. the occasi

which the alleged bit was

p.206

given. But an

Po Sin Kun asevents that he went.

that

д

Wong alone: against it w-base Lee's denial, suppato y the evidence

31

of the Lutfuctor that the accompanied

heim all the time

not in league with Lee,

Lee

$45

mitte

interpretor is

matrial paint

City

Zu the aird, I ob

Wong has lied in Lee's king me hesitate to rigand charge

frece

B

0

ģ Awink thiere na

whole cose: Ko San't evitence

production first of sherfid cutin

ཉ་

W Lee

===

We vico

much double

the manm

elicitad ie

Strab

must be clearly present

at the same. abem dismissal

of think the

haefit gree double

M

of the of

antai

صل

in which

the

the fine conceff

to the wilmers' mind

I sud heatate

hi evidence alone.

Surkator satt post the

2-911

The

pist charge

Kan

&

of the similar change in the case (now in circulation).

Care

Meromally

to

рь

with Lee, on

bitte occasins man when he saw

& Dentifics Wong as

the

there

the sand more on

at

two

g

The only coroboratur, expence whide Wong

brings is

that Wong

einlage's who say (each

A

told them that he paid, or wanted

topaz, the mone

The evidence

to Lee.

on charge B

againd Lee is therefore

A

the books

Them.

Gre

WKelly

but Ko Sam only defores

alleges that Z

ich hamnade pragment

thee. Iattack comind. Gratte

importance to the Witimesofs datement (p 10) where he burst out with English after the Interpreting had got the wind cre tangle. It is obviously

statement terms Grae

Auth dim senare off

I then you

he

Ann

umprem

to bear the

cintia

Eck latende

Every gentleman excuse word. About are this, fir Lea

Edit History

2026-06-02 11:42:32 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
368 the fact that he understands Leung In but never did so himself, says (p.17) that he paid. than paid mover Leung zu, says (p.17) Kelly momen two or Fieners, these timer Str. cannot apparently identify these occasions an witte the Jatro given in the books. I greatly doubt sluther Leang Lu's wvidue sufficiently explicit to be taken into account (2) gors дно must rest which م far Change ģ think the condemnabim the and Ko Sama that he pand huself velato con the money bot Charge (B), waiving money from Wong Joy chew; tha Wang Joy Chew alleges (p. 19) laat be paid $10 sofus to an entry in his books. (The books wire an ps admittedly altered later (p.21))/ 312, he says Gan interpretor ou that Lee भीत ¿ accommpain thee secard ouesi which he want to the shop mine. the occasi which the alleged bit was p.206 given. But an Po Sin Kun asevents that he went. that д Wong alone: against it w-base Lee's denial, suppato y the evidence 31 of the Lutfuctor that the accompanied heim all the time not in league with Lee, Lee $45 mitte interpretor is matrial paint City Zu the aird, I ob Wong has lied in Lee's king me hesitate to rigand charge frece B 0 ģ Awink thiere na whole cose: Ko San't evitence production first of sherfid cutin ཉ་ W Lee === We vico much double the manm elicitad ie Strab must be clearly present at the same. abem dismissal of think the haefit gree double M of the of antai صل in which the the fine conceff to the wilmers' mind I sud heatate hi evidence alone. Surkator satt post the 2-911 The pist charge Kan & of the similar change in the case (now in circulation). Care Meromally to рь with Lee, on bitte occasins man when he saw & Dentifics Wong as the there the sand more on at two g The only coroboratur, expence whide Wong brings is that Wong einlage's who say (each A told them that he paid, or wanted topaz, the mone The evidence to Lee. on charge B againd Lee is therefore A the books Them. Gre WKelly but Ko Sam only defores alleges that Z ich hamnade pragment thee. Iattack comind. Gratte importance to the Witimesofs datement (p 10) where he burst out with English after the Interpreting had got the wind cre tangle. It is obviously statement terms Grae Auth dim senare off I then you he Ann umprem to bear the cintia Eck latende Every gentleman excuse word. About are this, fir Lea
Baseline (Original)
368 the fact that he understands Leung In but never did so himself. says (p.17) that he paid. than paid mover Leung zu. says (p.17) Kelly momen two or Fieners. these timer Str. cannot apparently identify these occasions an witte the Jatro given in the books. I greatly dubt sluther Leang Lu's wvidue sufficiently explicit to b taken into account (2) gors дно must rest which م far Change ģ think the condemnabim the and Ko Sama that he pand huself velato con the money bot Charge (B), waiving money from Wong Joy chew; tha Wang Joy Chew .. alleges (p. 1g) laat be paid $10 sofus to an entry in his books. (The books wire an ps admittedly altered later (p.21))/ 312. he says Gan interpretor ou that Lee भीत ¿ accommpain thee secard ouesi which he want to the shop mine. the occasi which the alleged bit was p.206 given. But an Po Sin Kun asevents that he went. that д Wong alone: against it w-base Lee's denial, suppato y the evidence 31 of the Lutfuctor that the accompanied heim all the time not in league with Lee, Lee $45 mitte interpretor is matrial paint City Zu the aird, I ob Wong has lied in Lee's king me hesitate to rigand charge frece B 0 ģ Awink thiere na whole cose: Ko San't evitence production first of sherfid cutin ཉ་ W Lee === We vico much double the manm elicitad ie Strab must be clearly present at the same. abem dismissal of think the haefit gree double M of the of antai صل in which the the fine conceff to the wilmers' mind I sud heatate hi evidence alone. Surkator satt post the 2-911 The pist charge Kan & of the similar change in the case (now in circulation). Care Meromally to рь with Lee, on bitte occasins man when he saw & Dentifics Wong as the there the sand more on at two g The only coroboratur. expence whide Wong brings is that Wong einlage's who say (each A told them that he paid, or wanted topaz, the mone The evidence to Lee. on charge B againd Lee is therefore A the books Them. Gre WKelly but Ko Sam only defores alleges that Z ich hamnade pragment thee. Iattack comind. Gratte importance to the Witimesofs datement (p 10) where he burst out with English after the Interpreting had got the wind cre tangle. It is obviously statement terms Grae Auth dim senare off I then you he Ann umprem to bear the cintia Eck latende Every gentleman excuse word. About are this, fir Lea
2026-06-02 11:42:32 · Baseline
View content

368

the fact that he understands Leung In

but never did so himself. says (p.17) that he paid.

than paid mover

Leung zu. says (p.17)

Kelly momen

two or

Fieners. these timer Str.

cannot apparently identify these occasions

an

witte

the Jatro given

in the books.

I greatly dubt sluther Leang Lu's

wvidue

sufficiently explicit to b

taken into account

(2) gors

дно must rest

which

م

far

Change

ģ think the condemnabim

the

and

Ko Sama

that he pand

huself

velato con

the money

bot Charge (B), waiving money from

Wong Joy chew;

tha Wang Joy Chew

..

alleges (p. 1g) laat be paid $10 sofus to an entry in his books. (The

books wire

an

ps

admittedly altered later (p.21))/

312. he says

Gan interpretor

ou

that Lee

भीत

¿

accommpain

thee secard ouesi

which he want to the shop mine. the occasi

which the alleged bit was

p.206

given. But an

Po Sin Kun asevents that he went.

that

д

Wong alone: against it w-base Lee's denial, suppato y the evidence

31

of the Lutfuctor that the accompanied

heim all the time

not in league with Lee,

Lee

$45

mitte

interpretor is

matrial paint

City

Zu the aird, I ob

Wong has lied in Lee's king me hesitate to rigand charge

frece

B

0

ģ Awink thiere na

whole cose: Ko San't evitence

production first of sherfid cutin

ཉ་

W Lee

===

We vico

much double

the manm

elicitad ie

Strab

must be clearly present

at the same. abem dismissal

of think the

haefit gree double

M

of the of

antai

صل

in which

the

the fine conceff

to the wilmers' mind

I sud heatate

hi evidence alone.

Surkator satt post the

2-911

The

pist charge

Kan

&

of the similar change in the case (now in circulation).

Care

Meromally

to

рь

with Lee, on

bitte occasins man when he saw

& Dentifics Wong as

the

there

the sand more on

at

two

g

The only coroboratur. expence whide Wong

brings is

that Wong

einlage's who say (each

A

told them that he paid, or wanted

topaz, the mone

The evidence

to Lee.

on charge B

againd Lee is therefore

A

the books

Them.

Gre

WKelly

but Ko Sam only defores

alleges that Z

ich hamnade pragment

thee. Iattack comind. Gratte

importance to the Witimesofs datement (p 10) where he burst out with English after the Interpreting had got the wind cre tangle. It is obviously

statement terms Grae

Auth dim senare off

I then you

he

Ann

umprem

to bear the

cintia

Eck latende

Every gentleman excuse word. About are this, fir Lea

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.